Comments for George Benckenstein

Comment on Interruption vs Engagement Marketing by withusglobal

withusglobal — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:46:26 +0000

Thanks,great article George, new thinking for new landscape ! Will continue to explore same from your blog article in building my own arsenal of social networking skills.

Comment on Embrace Chaos To Conquer An Uncertain World by Benckenstein

Benckenstein — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:41:42 +0000

That is pretty close. All I can say is good job and great minds think alike

Comment on Return On Influence – The Real ROI by George Benckenstein

George Benckenstein — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:40:12 +0000

Hi Kim,

I would be happy for you to republish any part of the presentation. Please just add source and link back to my site in the final document.

Thanks for you interest.

Comment on Return On Influence – The Real ROI by Kim

Kim — Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:58:13 +0000

I work for the Dept. of Employment at the State of Minnesota. I am charged with creating a presentation for my co-workers (20-25 people) on one of the seven habits of highly effective people: synergize, and I would like permission to use part of this article within my presentation. From my perspective, trust is the key component to synergy and consequently to the presentation. I would appreciate it very much. Sincerely, Kim

Comment on Embrace Chaos To Conquer An Uncertain World by NewBusinessHawk

NewBusinessHawk — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:59:34 +0000

Funny, I wrote something close to this awhile back! Great minds and all that… http://adholes.com/postings/b1bc7b544350aeb3c6019...

Shortly I will have more thoughts on my blog!

Cheers!

Comment on Return On Influence – The Real ROI by George Benckenstein

George Benckenstein — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:13:47 +0000

I have definitely heard that and have researched it extensively. This video is the best one that sums up what you are describing!

[youtube qp0HIF3SfI4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp0HIF3SfI4 youtube]

Comment on Return On Influence – The Real ROI by George Benckenstein

George Benckenstein — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:11:01 +0000

Thanks Amy. The next 3 years are going to be very interesting indeed.

Comment on Return On Influence – The Real ROI by Amy Power

Amy Power — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:57:27 +0000

Corporate social media policies need to have a better understanding of the fact that personal and work life are blurred. I think many companies are still afraid to acknowledge this shift. This is a fantastic article.

Comment on Swine Flu, Susan Boyle And The Network Multiplier Effect by George Benckenstein

George Benckenstein — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:42:00 +0000

I would agree with you in a general sense. Which is why viruses and messages have a lifespan. And if involvement is only to push out "talkiing points" then your network really isn't supporting a bi-directional conversation. This happens in real life as well. We all have friendships that wane for whatever reason. Apply this to networks, you will have people entering and exiting your ecosystem all the time. Real conversation as opposed to "talking points" has the potential to multiply unfettered. This does not minimize that the need to reinvent ever stops or that relationships of any source don't have a lifetime. But remember that wherever there is death, there is a rebirth in any ecosystem creating a continuum with no bounds (theoretically that is).

Comment on Swine Flu, Susan Boyle And The Network Multiplier Effect by entropydecides

entropydecides — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:29:52 +0000

I am sorry my previous post was not focused. I agree with a reduction due to spam. With parasitic spam a constant component, the system evolves "natural" coping mechanisms. Although unlikely, the coping mechanisms can become insufficient. In the long term, the networking paradigm becomes "tired"; loses viability in the demands of a quotidian environment. Nonetheless, viral affective potential matures and becomes honed in a more restricted application.